BAD NEWS FOR SENATORS! Magu Stays As EFCC Chairman – Osinbajo

Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo has a bad news for Nigerian Senator as they go on Easter break. He has ruled out the possibility of President Muhammadu Buhari replacing the Acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes, Mr. Ibrahim Magu.

The Senate led by Mr. Bukola Saraki are allergic to that name and have twice rejected confirming him as the substantive chairman of the anti-graft agency, citing negative security report as their reason.

But the Vice President said Buhari refuses to see the security report prepared by the Department of State Services, which the Senate claimed to have relied on in rejecting Magu, as a strong reason to replace him.

Osinbajo dropped the hint as he spoke with some journalists from select media houses and social media activists at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

He said that despite being rejected twice, the government was still at liberty to renominate Magu. Mr. Osinbajo adopted the opinion Lagos lawyer, Mr. Femi Falana (SAN), that Senate confirmation was not needed for the EFCC chairman based on the provisions of Section 171 of the constitution.

The Vice President said. “It is up to the Senate to make their judgment (on Magu), and it is up to us say what we want to do. If our candidate is rejected, we can re-present him.

“No law says we can’t re-present him. And again, there is the other argument, whether or not we need to present him for confirmation and that’s a compelling argument from Femi Falana.

“His argument is that under the Constitution, Section 171, and if you look at that section, it talks about the appointments that the President can make. They include appointments of ministers, ambassadors and heads of agencies such as the EFCC.

“In that same Section 171, the Constitution rightly said that certain appointments must go to the Senate such as ministerial and ambassadorial appointments. Those of heads of agencies like the EFCC do not have to go to the Senate.

“That’s what the constitution says. But the EFCC Act, which of course as you know is inferior, says that EFCC chairman should go to the Senate for confirmation.

“I am sure that even a pocket book lawyer knows that when a legislation conflicts with Constitution, it’s the constitution that prevails. I agree with Mr. Falana that there was no need in the first place to have sent Magu’s name to the Senate, but we did so and it was rejected by the Senate, but I believe that it can be re-presented.

“I don’t think there is anything wrong about the fact that Senate has rejected him. Senate has acted in its own wisdom to say ‘No, we don’t want him’, and we can say, ‘This is our candidate… we like the gentleman and we want him to continue.”

Osinbajo made it clear that Buhari could have interfered with the DSS report that indicted Magu if he wanted to. Instead the President elected to hear Magu’s version, after which he felt convinced and decided to retain him.

“We should commend the President for not interfering with what the DSS said. The DSS came up with a report and the man who was accused refuted it.

“He explains and gives a reason. When that happened, the President looked at what Magu said and what the DSS wrote and he said ‘I am satisfied with what Magu said’.

“He then decided to retain Magu as the nominee for EFCC. I don’t see any reason why that should be contested.

“The President has not interfered with what the DSS said. If he wanted to interfere, he would have ordered the DSS to keep quiet. He didn’t do that, but he said ‘I don’t think the DSS report is meritorious enough to withdraw his nomination.’

“The President reserves the right to say, ‘this is who I want’. I’m fully in support of Magu as the EFCC chairman just as the President is,” Osinbajo said.